H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 3-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2014 Brisbane fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 2014* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 6-3 6-1 Casey Dellacqua #142 Match data
Jan 20, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-1 6-0 Casey Dellacqua #126 Match data
May 7, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #26 6-2 6-2 Casey Dellacqua #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Casey Dellacqua
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —