H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Christina Mchale H2H: 2-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2014 US Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Christina Mchale
United States Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #17 6-3 6-2 Christina Mchale #44 Match data Aug 28, 2014* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-0 6-0 Christina Mchale #44 Match data Feb 15, 2013* R16 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Christina Mchale #192 2-6 2-2 (ret.) Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data Apr 15, 2010* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 167 210 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,557 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,718 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2012 21–21 50.0% #33 1,668 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,633 0 0
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,623 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2016 25–22 53.2% #45 1,688 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2017 19–27 41.3% #64 1,682 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,565 0 1
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,651 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,526 0 1
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,453 0 1
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Christina Mchale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 13 11 24 54.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2013 9 10 19 47.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 16 18 34 47.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 5 11 16 31.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 115 129 244 47.1% 34 51 85 40.0% 16 28 44 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 352/378 of Christina Mchale's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Christina Mchale
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% 2009 3/3 3.0 2.3 59.2% 59.9% 39.0% 56.3% 41.3% 51.5% 45.0%
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2010 16/17 2.8 1.8 61.7% 62.7% 41.5% 46.7% 42.5% 54.2% 41.0%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2011 35/36 2.8 3.0 60.8% 63.8% 46.4% 52.4% 41.9% 57.0% 43.0%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2012 40/42 2.7 2.3 64.6% 62.9% 45.5% 51.7% 44.6% 56.6% 41.7%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2013 26/31 2.2 3.4 62.0% 62.5% 45.8% 51.8% 46.8% 56.4% 42.1%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2014 40/41 2.5 4.3 59.8% 64.5% 43.8% 53.1% 46.4% 56.1% 43.8%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2015 30/39 2.3 3.0 62.9% 62.3% 47.3% 54.8% 44.4% 56.7% 37.6%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2016 44/48 2.9 3.8 59.8% 63.9% 43.4% 51.5% 50.6% 55.7% 45.2%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2017 43/46 2.7 4.3 60.5% 63.0% 43.1% 58.3% 52.1% 55.0% 44.6%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2018 25/25 1.5 4.9 60.6% 60.7% 38.8% 54.7% 50.5% 52.3% 42.1%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2019 17/17 1.4 3.5 63.6% 58.8% 41.6% 49.6% 48.0% 52.4% 46.3%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2020 14/14 1.4 3.4 64.7% 59.9% 44.8% 46.3% 46.8% 54.5% 41.6%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% 2021 18/18 1.6 3.4 63.9% 55.6% 39.5% 47.4% 47.3% 49.7% 41.6%
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 45.2% 35.7% 50.0% 16.7% 42.2% 34.7%
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 352/378 2.4 3.5 61.7% 62.3% 43.8% 52.5% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Christina Mchale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2009 1499 112.0 -1.43 -0.60 0.927 48.4% +20 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — +0.21
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 2010 1558 114.8 -0.88 -1.14 0.895 47.6% +8 -2 — 38.2% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.19
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2011 1718 138.4 +1.67 -0.12 0.999 49.9% -36 -92 -111 49.4% -0.19 6–5 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -0.79
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2012 1669 131.2 +1.31 -0.92 0.962 49.2% +12 -8 -43 50.5% -0.06 10–9 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 98.5 +0.10
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2013 1633 129.7 +0.29 -1.34 0.964 49.2% +46 -17 -42 45.9% -0.43 4–8 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 97.6 +0.57
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2014 1648 128.3 +0.05 +0.06 0.998 49.9% +21 -20 -61 46.9% -0.16 9–9 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.2 -0.76
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2015 1624 117.2 -1.05 -2.81 0.869 47.3% -8 -19 +3 48.2% -0.42 5–8 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2016 1689 132.8 -0.26 +1.86 1.022 50.6% -20 -71 +21 50.9% +0.02 13–9 (59%) 8–5 (62%) 105.3 -0.48
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2017 1682 134.3 -0.73 +0.47 0.992 50.0% +22 -90 -13 45.4% -0.08 7–11 (39%) 2–12 (14%) 87.9 -0.74
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2018 1565 113.9 -3.09 -1.16 0.882 47.4% +18 -24 — 33.9% -0.96 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 94.3 -0.53
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2019 1652 124.8 -2.57 +1.92 0.974 49.2% +43 — — 39.0% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.25
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2020 1675 129.3 -0.85 -0.02 0.915 48.3% +51 -150 — 45.5% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.88
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 2021 1526 113.1 -3.71 -1.23 0.828 45.8% +71 -40 -50 25.6% -1.56 0–7 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 95.3 -0.33
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 2022 1453 96.2 +3.05 -2.38 0.600 38.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 2025 1428 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 1804 132.0 -0.48 -0.28 0.953 49.0% +13 -42 -28 45.1% -0.35 67–80 (46%) 40–48 (45%) 94.6 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.