H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 3-2

Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–2 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2013 US Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 2013* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 6-2 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #48 Match data
Mar 6, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 6-4 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #73 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Victoria Azarenka #5 6-3 3-6 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #23 Match data
Feb 24, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #30 4-6 6-1 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data
Aug 2, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #10 6-3 1-6 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —