H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 3-3

Victoria Azarenka and Ekaterina Makarova are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2014 US Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 2014* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Ekaterina Makarova #18 6-4 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #17 Match data
May 9, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Ekaterina Makarova #24 1-6 6-2 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #3 Match data
May 30, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #4 6-2 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #33 Match data
Mar 9, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 6-4 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #41 Match data
Jan 13, 2011* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #10 2-6 6-2 6-4 Ekaterina Makarova #49 Match data
Jun 20, 2010* Eastbourne WTA 500 F Grass Ekaterina Makarova #100 7-6(5) 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —