H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 8-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 8–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 6, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Victoria Azarenka #683 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #16 Match data
Jan 6, 2016* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #22 6-2 6-0 Elena Vesnina #115 Match data
Aug 31, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #17 6-1 6-1 Elena Vesnina #56 Match data
May 29, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Victoria Azarenka #3 6-1 6-4 Elena Vesnina #38 Match data
Jan 23, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-1 Elena Vesnina #47 Match data
Oct 5, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #78 Match data
Mar 12, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #11 6-3 7-5 Elena Vesnina #56 Match data
Oct 6, 2007* Tashkent WTA 250 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #35 6-4 6-2 Elena Vesnina #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Elena Vesnina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21