H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 4-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2013 Carlsbad fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2013* Carlsbad WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #55 Match data
Jun 4, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #3 6-3 6-0 Francesca Schiavone #50 Match data
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #28 4-6 6-2 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #17 6-1 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #19 Match data
May 4, 2007* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #68 6-2 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 — — — — — — — 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 — — — — — — — 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 — — — — — — — 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8