H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Jie Zheng H2H: 3-1
Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–1 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 US Open third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-0 6-1 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2009* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-1 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-3 7-5 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| May 4, 2006* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jie Zheng | 7-5 6-4 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |