H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 4-0
Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2015 US Open first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-2 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-3 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| May 13, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 7-5 2-6 6-1 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |