H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 6-2

Victoria Azarenka holds a 6–2 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2018 Mallorca fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2018* Mallorca WTA 250 R16 Grass Lucie Safarova #53 6-3 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #85 Match data
Mar 1, 2015* Doha WTA 500 F Hard Lucie Safarova #15 6-4 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #48 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Victoria Azarenka #5 6-3 3-6 6-2 Lucie Safarova #32 Match data
Sep 30, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #11 6-1 6-3 Lucie Safarova #30 Match data
Mar 25, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #7 6-4 6-2 Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Oct 2, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 7-5 6-4 Lucie Safarova #43 Match data
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 7-6(5) 6-4 Lucie Safarova #61 Match data
May 5, 2007* Estoril WTA 250 SF Clay Victoria Azarenka #68 6-4 6-0 Lucie Safarova #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —