H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victoria Azarenka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 Miami Open round of 64 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-3 7-5 Michaella Krajicek #71 Match data Mar 21, 2012* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka — #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Michaella Krajicek — #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,817 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,873 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,673 0 3
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,538 0 3
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,539 0 3
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,508 0 3
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,179 1 14 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,590 0 3
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,127 2 17 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,563 0 3
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,546 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 — — — — — — —
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 — — — — — — —
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 — — — — — — —
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,832 2 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 51.1% 45.6% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 2007 1818 145.1 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +3 -215 -229 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 2008 1873 154.7 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -22 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.29 2007 1674 134.7 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -38 +107 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.44
19 2009 1941 165.6 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -49 -222 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2008 1538 99.5 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +19 -25 +205 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.7 +0.72
20 2010 1949 163.2 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -124 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2009 1539 115.0 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +23 — +166 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.23
21 2011 2021 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +13 -109 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2010 1508 96.4 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +33 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +13 -158 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2011 1591 120.3 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +34 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.99
23 2013 2127 170.5 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +46 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2012 1563 112.2 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +62 -55 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.18
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2013 1537 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +54 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.29
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +66 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2015 1550 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1893 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +121 +73 +61 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2017 1530 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +35 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +73 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +28 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +218 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.04 2024 1503 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2250 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -36 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 1803 124.7 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -85 +78 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.