H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-0
Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Victoria Azarenka | 6-3 7-5 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Victoria Azarenka | 6-3 6-3 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |