H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Mona Barthel H2H: 4-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix quarterfinal 6-4 6-7(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Mona Barthel
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 6-7(3) 7-5 Mona Barthel #35 Match data Apr 28, 2012* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(6) Mona Barthel #37 Match data Mar 10, 2012* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-0 Mona Barthel #39 Match data Feb 16, 2012* R32 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-4 Mona Barthel #44 Match data Jan 22, 2012* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Mona Barthel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 — — — — — — —
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Mona Barthel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 309/334 of Mona Barthel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Mona Barthel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1%
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7%
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5%
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Mona Barthel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.14
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 — 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.58
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 — 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 — 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 2020 1535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 — — 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 2023 1420 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 2025 1576 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 2026 1556 106.9 +0.25 -2.28 0.918 47.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.