H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–1 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2011 Roland Garros second round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #4 6-0 6-1 Pauline Parmentier #105 Match data
Feb 21, 2009* Memphis WTA 250 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #14 6-4 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #86 Match data
Oct 7, 2007* Tashkent WTA 250 F Hard Pauline Parmentier #87 7-5 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —