H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 4-5

Petra Kvitova holds a 5–4 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Indian Wells third round 7-5 6-4.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2021* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #32 7-5 6-4 Petra Kvitova #11 Match data
Feb 1, 2019* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #2 6-2 7-6(3) Victoria Azarenka #51 Match data
Aug 13, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #21 6-2 6-3 Petra Kvitova #4 Match data
Nov 1, 2011* WTA Championships WTA Finals F Hard Petra Kvitova #2 7-5 4-6 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #3 Match data
Jul 3, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Petra Kvitova #8 6-1 3-6 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #5 Match data
May 8, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Petra Kvitova #18 7-6(3) 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #5 Match data
Jun 26, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Petra Kvitova #62 7-5 6-0 Victoria Azarenka #11 Match data
Jan 21, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Victoria Azarenka #14 6-2 6-1 Petra Kvitova #40 Match data
May 1, 2008* Prague WTA 250 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #26 6-3 6-4 Petra Kvitova #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2025 1–8 11.1% 1,773 2 31