H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 4-5
Petra Kvitova holds a 5–4 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Indian Wells third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
5
9 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 7-5 6-4 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2019* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-2 7-6(3) | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-3 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2011* | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Petra Kvitova | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| May 8, 2011* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Petra Kvitova | 7-5 6-0 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-1 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| May 1, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-3 6-4 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |