H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 4-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2016 Brisbane quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2016* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #22 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #15 Match data
Sep 28, 2012* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #16 Match data
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #4 6-3 6-2 Roberta Vinci #31 Match data
May 26, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Victoria Azarenka #9 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10