H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 8-1
Victoria Azarenka holds a 8–1 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 7–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2016 Indian Wells fourth round 6-1 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
8
–
1
9 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2013* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| May 18, 2013* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 4-6 7-6(5) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2012* | Doha | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-2 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2011 | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-2 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2010* | Stanford | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-3 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-0 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2008* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 7-6(4) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Samantha Stosur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 |