H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Shuai Peng H2H: 5-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 5–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2011 Eastbourne third round 6-4 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Victoria Azarenka #5 6-4 7-6(2) Shuai Peng #20 Match data
Feb 17, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Shuai Peng #39 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shuai Peng #50 3-0 (ret.) Victoria Azarenka #11 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 6-3 6-3 Shuai Peng #37 Match data
May 14, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #9 6-4 6-1 Shuai Peng #32 Match data
Oct 1, 2005* Guangzhou WTA 500 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #202 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Shuai Peng #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —