H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 4-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-1 7-5.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #6 6-1 7-5 Sybille Bammer #47 Match data
Jul 31, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 6-2 6-2 Sybille Bammer #32 Match data
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #19 6-1 6-3 Sybille Bammer #22 Match data
Oct 11, 2007* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #32 6-3 6-4 Sybille Bammer #21 Match data
Nov 2, 2006* Quebec City WTA 500 R32 Hard Sybille Bammer #58 2-6 6-2 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21