H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Venus Williams H2H: 3-5

Venus Williams holds a 5–3 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2020 Rome second round 7-6(7) 6-2.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 2020* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #14 7-6(7) 6-2 Venus Williams #70 Match data
Aug 13, 2020* Lexington WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #67 6-3 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #58 Match data
Jan 3, 2019* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #39 6-3 1-6 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #51 Match data
May 6, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #31 6-3 7-5 Venus Williams #16 Match data
Feb 28, 2015* Doha WTA 500 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #48 2-6 6-2 6-4 Venus Williams #17 Match data
Aug 1, 2014* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #25 6-4 7-6(1) Victoria Azarenka #10 Match data
Sep 26, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #63 6-2 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #2 Match data
Feb 21, 2010* Dubai WTA 1000 F Hard Venus Williams #5 6-3 7-5 Victoria Azarenka #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47