H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 2-0
Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2008 Los Angeles third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2008* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-3 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2007* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Victoria Azarenka | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |