H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 1-0
Viktorija Golubic holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Wozniak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktorija Golubic won the 2014 Shenzhen third round 4-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2014* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |