H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 0-1
Eugenie Bouchard holds a 1–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eugenie Bouchard won the 2018 Gstaad fourth round 7-6(2) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Eugenie Bouchard | 7-6(2) 7-6(7) | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2016 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-4 2-0 (ret.) | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |