H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 0-1
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2017 Quebec City fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 6-2 6-4 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2017* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sachia Vickery | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |