H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-1
Viktorija Golubic and Samantha Stosur are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on grass, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktorija Golubic won the 2021 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2021* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Viktorija Golubic | 6-2 6-3 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Samantha Stosur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 |