H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Viktoriya Tomova vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-0
Viktoriya Tomova holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktoriya Tomova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Viktoriya Tomova won the 2017 Bastad third round 6-4 2-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2017* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Viktoriya Tomova | 6-4 2-2 (ret.) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Tomova | #207 | #46 | 1,235 | 1,760 | 54 | 106 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Viktoriya Tomova | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #90 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #53 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #131 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |