H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Viktoriya Tomova vs Madison Brengle
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Viktoriya Tomova vs Madison Brengle.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Tomova | #207 | #46 | 1,235 | 1,760 | 54 | 106 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Madison Brengle | #210 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,740 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktoriya Tomova | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #90 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #53 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #131 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |