H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Viktoriya Tomova vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-0
Viktoriya Tomova holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktoriya Tomova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Viktoriya Tomova won the 2025 Wimbledon first round 7-6(5) 2-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Viktoriya Tomova | 7-6(5) 2-0 (ret.) | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2018 | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 6-1 | Viktoriya Tomova | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Tomova | #207 | #46 | 1,235 | 1,760 | 54 | 106 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktoriya Tomova | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #90 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2024 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #53 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #131 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |