H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2007 Antwerp fourth round 7-6(6) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-6(6) 7-5 Virginie Razzano #85 Match data
May 6, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 6-2 Virginie Razzano #39 Match data
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #5 6-3 7-5 Virginie Razzano #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —