H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Virginie Razzano vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 1-0
Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Virginie Razzano | 6-3 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,854 | 201 | 217 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 187 | 206 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginie Razzano | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #144 | 1,667 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,646 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,553 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,479 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,427 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,408 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |