H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Emilie Loit H2H: 2-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on carpet, while Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2007 US Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginie Razzano #37 6-1 6-2 Emilie Loit #39 Match data
Apr 6, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Virginie Razzano #54 7-5 (ret.) Emilie Loit #56 Match data
Feb 6, 2003* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Emilie Loit #54 6-3 6-2 Virginie Razzano #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,780 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,511 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,456 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,548 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,651 0 2
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,546 0 2
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,621 0 2
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,609 0 3
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,513 0 3
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,531 0 3
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —