H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 1-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2006 Paris round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #40 6-1 6-1 Kveta Peschke #35 Match data Feb 9, 2006* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Kveta Peschke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Kveta Peschke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 34/75 of Kveta Peschke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Kveta Peschke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% 2004 2/6 2.0 1.5 63.2% 61.3% 52.4% 33.9% 32.2% 58.1% 45.8%
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2005 8/40 0.9 4.8 56.4% 67.1% 38.3% 66.7% 44.7% 54.3% 50.0%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% 2006 22/27 0.9 3.6 60.2% 56.2% 39.8% 45.2% 36.4% 49.5% 41.6%
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.5 74.4% 52.8% 40.9% 51.9% 76.7% 49.8% 45.6%
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 34/208 0.9 3.8 60.3% 58.9% 40.2% 50.0% 40.5% 51.1% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Kveta Peschke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.