H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 0-3

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2011 Paris third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2011* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Nadia Petrova #20 6-1 6-3 Virginie Razzano #83 Match data
Aug 11, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 Virginie Razzano #52 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-1 6-2 Virginie Razzano #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —