H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Shinobu Asagoe H2H: 1-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Shinobu Asagoe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2001 US Open round of 128 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shinobu Asagoe
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #72 6-4 5-7 6-4 Shinobu Asagoe #71 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Shinobu Asagoe #215 #21 1,254 1,761 95 121 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Shinobu Asagoe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #158 1,526 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 1998 0–3 0.0% #157 1,486 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 1999 3–3 50.0% #122 1,507 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2000 9–9 50.0% #72 1,580 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2001 10–20 33.3% #108 1,536 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2002 5–9 35.7% #96 1,521 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2003 19–15 55.9% #45 1,665 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2004 19–22 46.3% #37 1,633 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2005 25–25 50.0% #38 1,629 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 2006 4–14 22.2% #215 1,529 0 0
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Shinobu Asagoe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 8 11 19 42.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 13 15 28 46.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 15 16 31 48.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 57 80 137 41.6% 14 20 34 41.2% 16 14 30 53.3% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 39/143 of Shinobu Asagoe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Shinobu Asagoe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% 2003 8/34 0.8 2.0 71.8% 61.9% 43.1% 49.0% 39.1% 56.6% 41.6%
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% 2004 10/41 1.2 2.2 70.5% 55.1% 48.0% 45.9% 52.2% 53.2% 42.0%
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2005 8/50 1.1 2.1 69.5% 62.7% 45.8% 46.7% 49.0% 57.9% 44.9%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% 2006 13/18 0.9 4.2 61.9% 57.1% 37.4% 48.7% 55.5% 49.9% 42.1%
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 39/216 1.0 2.8 67.7% 58.7% 43.0% 47.6% 50.0% 53.8% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Shinobu Asagoe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1997 1526 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.75 — — — -0.11
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 1998 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.03
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 1999 1508 112.7 — — — — +48 — — 53.8% +0.38 0–1 — — +0.71
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2000 1581 117.7 — — — — +9 — +37 47.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) — — +1.09
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2001 1536 116.8 — — — — +31 -47 — 37.0% -1.04 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.76
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2002 1521 114.2 — — — — +9 — — 41.2% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.9 +0.18
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2003 1666 120.4 +0.37 -0.93 0.956 48.9% -107 -121 +142 51.9% -0.18 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 109.8 +0.32
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2004 1634 121.9 -0.67 -0.92 0.898 47.5% -54 -33 +147 45.2% -0.45 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 +0.66
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2005 1630 136.0 +0.96 +0.30 1.068 51.2% +17 -25 +68 48.1% +0.09 4–6 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 93.3 +1.21
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 2006 1530 106.1 -3.53 -1.20 0.839 46.4% +60 -24 — 26.8% -1.73 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.4 -0.69
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1761 126.0 -1.08 -0.77 0.919 48.2% -7 -44 +107 43.9% -0.46 35–37 (49%) 20–28 (42%) 95.6 +1.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.