H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Virginie Razzano holds a 3–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2008 Qatar Open round of 64 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-3 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Feb 20, 2008* | R64 | Qatar Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Virginie Razzano | 6-0 6-0 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Sep 28, 2007* | R16 | Guangzhou Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Virginie Razzano | 6-0 7-5 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | May 10, 2007* | R32 | Prague | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,854 | 201 | 217 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Virginie Razzano | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Virginie Razzano | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 28 | 11 | 39 | 71.8% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 109 | 116 | 225 | 48.4% | 64 | 67 | 131 | 48.9% | 23 | 23 | 46 | 50.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Virginie Razzano | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 5/35 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 63.9% | 64.9% | 39.5% | 53.6% | 53.7% | 55.6% | 50.3% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2004 | 5/15 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 60.8% | 62.6% | 43.1% | 56.8% | 61.8% | 55.3% | 40.7% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2005 | 12/38 | 1.3 | 5.5 | 64.0% | 63.5% | 42.1% | 57.4% | 44.1% | 55.3% | 44.0% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2006 | 20/28 | 1.0 | 4.6 | 66.9% | 59.4% | 45.1% | 57.2% | 45.7% | 54.6% | 40.7% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2007 | 30/54 | 1.8 | 4.6 | 64.7% | 61.1% | 43.5% | 53.3% | 50.7% | 55.0% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 30/36 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 64.0% | 61.1% | 43.0% | 55.7% | 50.1% | 54.5% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 47/51 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 64.6% | 63.0% | 48.1% | 53.6% | 45.8% | 57.8% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 23/24 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 64.6% | 59.7% | 41.3% | 49.3% | 54.3% | 53.2% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 25/26 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 65.7% | 62.1% | 42.1% | 51.7% | 50.1% | 55.2% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 13/14 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 62.9% | 59.8% | 41.7% | 56.8% | 54.0% | 53.0% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 13/17 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 66.1% | 63.1% | 48.1% | 61.1% | 46.5% | 57.6% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 11/12 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 71.3% | 61.8% | 41.6% | 54.4% | 55.4% | 55.9% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 73.6% | 58.7% | 52.3% | 53.1% | 55.2% | 57.9% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 9/9 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 64.7% | 62.8% | 37.8% | 49.2% | 55.4% | 53.8% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 249/418 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 65.2% | 61.6% | 44.0% | 54.2% | 50.0% | 55.4% | 43.6% | Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Virginie Razzano | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1999 | 1484 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.23 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 2000 | 1481 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | 40.0% | -0.53 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.1 | +0.38 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 2001 | 1579 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -3 | +66 | 44.4% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.6 | -0.70 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 2002 | 1658 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | -42 | -61 | — | 48.1% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.2 | -2.19 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 2003 | 1613 | 121.0 | -0.21 | +2.36 | 1.133 | 52.9% | -31 | +1 | +72 | 45.6% | -0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.5 | -0.11 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 2004 | 1594 | 104.5 | -0.89 | -1.63 | 0.911 | 48.4% | -36 | -11 | +105 | 46.9% | -0.69 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | 100.4 | +0.44 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 2005 | 1606 | 127.3 | +0.37 | +0.22 | 0.983 | 49.8% | -74 | +84 | +60 | 41.2% | -0.66 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–8 (27%) | 100.4 | -0.08 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 2006 | 1594 | 129.9 | -0.29 | -1.94 | 0.897 | 48.2% | +18 | +21 | — | 40.9% | -0.50 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.8 | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1806 | 138.8 | -0.54 | +0.52 | 1.003 | 50.2% | +49 | -251 | — | 61.9% | +0.91 | 9–4 (69%) | 10–6 (63%) | 109.3 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1635 | 123.8 | -0.44 | -0.24 | 0.968 | 49.5% | +52 | -83 | -67 | 45.1% | -0.35 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–3 (63%) | 96.6 | +0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1789 | 138.2 | +2.43 | +0.57 | 1.037 | 51.0% | -69 | -109 | -67 | 54.9% | +0.62 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–9 (36%) | 100.1 | -0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1655 | 119.8 | -2.12 | -0.81 | 0.917 | 48.1% | -4 | -39 | — | 41.5% | -0.92 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–1 | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1681 | 123.8 | +0.20 | +0.19 | 0.970 | 49.6% | -1 | -65 | -3 | 51.9% | +0.11 | 4–2 (67%) | 6–3 (67%) | 105.2 | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1633 | 114.8 | -1.74 | -0.90 | 0.889 | 47.6% | +11 | +12 | +24 | 39.3% | -0.86 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | -0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1682 | 127.1 | +0.95 | -0.89 | 0.992 | 50.1% | -10 | -7 | — | 51.3% | +0.31 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–4 (33%) | 99.5 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1621 | 106.8 | -0.91 | +0.76 | 0.992 | 49.8% | +5 | +39 | -17 | 41.4% | -0.52 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.7 | -0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1656 | 110.4 | +0.27 | +1.25 | 1.081 | 51.4% | — | +28 | — | 75.0% | +2.13 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1646 | 107.5 | -0.91 | +0.91 | 0.973 | 49.6% | — | +40 | — | 47.6% | +0.19 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1581 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1572 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1855 | 132.0 | +0.03 | -0.04 | 0.978 | 49.7% | -7 | -34 | +14 | 48.1% | -0.12 | 66–62 (52%) | 57–52 (52%) | 104.4 | -1.27 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaia Kanepi | 5 | 3 | 8 | Mar 23, 2011 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 20, 2016 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jan 14, 2010 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 5 | 2 | 7 | Jun 28, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |