H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Vitalia Diatchenko vs Jie Zheng H2H: 0-1
Jie Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Vitalia Diatchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2011 US Open first round 4-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |