H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 0-1
Olga Govortsova holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Govortsova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2009 Guangzhou third round 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |