H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 0-1
Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Zarina Diyas | 6-3 6-4 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |