H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Xiyu Wang vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-2

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 2–1 lead over Xiyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Xiyu Wang won the 2023 Mérida Open first round 7-5 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Xiyu Wang
China Age 25 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Xiyu Wang #62 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) Alison Riske-Amritraj #58 Match data Feb 23, 2023* R32 Mérida Open WTA 250 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #29 6-4 3-6 6-4 Xiyu Wang #75 Match data Sep 4, 2022* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #28 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) Xiyu Wang #145 Match data Jun 9, 2021* R32 Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Xiyu Wang #80 #49 1,199 1,774 71 92 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Xiyu Wang Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2017 1–1 50.0% #639 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2018 1–3 25.0% #209 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2019 2–7 22.2% #144 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2020 6–3 66.7% #123 1,642 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2021 2–7 22.2% #131 1,589 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0
21 2022 13–10 56.5% #50 1,701 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0
22 2023 16–24 40.0% #70 1,697 0 1 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0
23 2024 21–23 47.7% #98 1,694 0 1 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1
24 2025 3–9 25.0% #175 1,619 0 1 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2026 6–5 54.5% #80 1,769 0 1 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Xiyu Wang Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2019 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2022 11 6 17 64.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2023 10 16 26 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
23 2024 15 16 31 48.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2025 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2026 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 53 69 122 43.4% 16 16 32 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 155/163 of Xiyu Wang's and 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Xiyu Wang Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2017 2/2 0.5 1.0 64.3% 61.3% 42.5% 41.7% 27.8% 54.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2018 4/4 1.8 3.5 64.2% 50.9% 47.7% 28.6% 42.1% 49.8% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2019 9/9 1.7 4.1 61.9% 58.3% 47.8% 41.7% 27.6% 54.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 9/9 4.7 5.7 61.8% 71.7% 45.1% 56.8% 43.6% 61.6% 44.0% 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7%
20 2021 9/9 5.3 7.7 61.0% 69.1% 46.8% 54.2% 43.3% 60.1% 35.7% 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5%
21 2022 23/23 3.7 5.2 64.7% 65.3% 41.4% 55.3% 43.1% 56.9% 41.2% 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7%
22 2023 40/40 4.3 5.0 64.6% 68.4% 44.1% 54.9% 38.4% 59.9% 40.4% 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2%
23 2024 41/44 4.0 4.1 63.6% 67.6% 48.0% 59.1% 42.3% 60.2% 41.7% 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5%
24 2025 8/12 1.3 2.8 67.1% 59.2% 46.5% 47.6% 51.7% 54.8% 41.6% 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3%
25 2026 10/11 0.9 2.1 72.0% 59.2% 45.6% 62.7% 62.8% 56.8% 46.7% 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2%
Career — 155/163 3.6 4.5 64.4% 65.8% 45.5% 54.7% 42.3% 58.5% 41.1% — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Xiyu Wang Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2017 1493 102.6 -0.03 -1.38 0.942 48.5% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2018 1539 113.0 -1.31 -1.37 0.806 45.1% +12 — — 33.3% -1.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2019 1549 116.5 -1.02 -2.91 0.808 45.8% +8 — — 26.3% -1.63 0–1 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 1642 128.8 +2.08 -0.04 1.144 52.7% +21 — — 61.9% +1.14 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.4 0.00 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48
20 2021 1590 113.7 +1.46 -3.26 0.895 48.3% -1 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 4–2 (67%) 99.6 -0.61 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54
21 2022 1702 127.2 +0.16 -0.43 0.957 49.1% -3 -89 — 54.5% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 -0.30 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29
22 2023 1698 126.2 +1.61 -1.99 1.006 50.0% -39 -37 -107 44.8% -0.23 7–11 (39%) 6–13 (32%) 91.1 +0.18 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38
23 2024 1695 141.6 +3.01 -0.70 1.047 50.9% -13 +15 — 48.5% +0.17 6–9 (40%) 9–14 (39%) 93.9 -1.78 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46
24 2025 1620 123.7 -0.71 -1.00 0.920 47.8% +30 — — 30.8% -0.96 0–2 0–2 — -0.15 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44
25 2026 1770 138.1 +1.51 +2.93 1.082 52.0% -45 +23 — 47.6% +0.38 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.32 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21
Career — 1775 135.8 +1.41 -1.04 0.990 49.8% -9 -17 -107 45.6% -0.18 22–35 (39%) 29–40 (42%) 91.3 -1.70 — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.