H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Xiyu Wang vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-2
Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 2–1 lead over Xiyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Xiyu Wang won the 2023 Merida third round 7-5 4-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023* | Merida | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Xiyu Wang | 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Xiyu Wang | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2021* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) | Xiyu Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiyu Wang | #89 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,776 | 66 | 88 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #89 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |