H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 0-1
Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2018 Guangzhou fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 7-6(5) | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |