H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0
Yafan Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2015 Hong Kong third round 6-3 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2015* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-3 4-1 (ret.) | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |