H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Yafan Wang vs Coco Vandeweghe

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yafan Wang vs Coco Vandeweghe.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yafan Wang
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yafan Wang #51 6-2 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #459 Match data Aug 10, 2019 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yafan Wang #422 #47 1,185 1,802 72 90 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yafan Wang Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2014 3–1 75.0% #180 1,549 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2015 1–3 25.0% #136 1,546 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2016 3–8 27.3% #116 1,533 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2017 5–5 50.0% #170 1,542 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2018 11–12 47.8% #70 1,619 0 0 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2019 25–21 54.3% #48 1,723 0 1 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2020 3–6 33.3% #95 1,667 0 1 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2021 1–9 10.0% #309 1,496 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2023 1–1 50.0% #100 1,628 0 1 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2024 15–16 48.4% #61 1,718 0 1 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2025 4–8 33.3% #279 1,697 0 1 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yafan Wang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2014 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2016 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2017 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2018 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2019 22 14 36 61.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2020 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 69 132 47.7% 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 153/162 of Yafan Wang's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yafan Wang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2014 4/4 2.0 4.5 59.7% 64.6% 43.3% 56.5% 66.7% 56.0% 41.3% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2015 1/4 0.0 4.0 63.8% 50.0% 41.2% 28.6% 25.0% 46.8% 34.7% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2016 9/11 1.0 3.3 56.8% 62.9% 42.8% 35.4% 38.0% 54.1% 41.8% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2017 10/10 1.1 3.5 57.8% 58.4% 43.0% 57.8% 57.8% 51.5% 47.0% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2018 23/23 2.0 3.0 64.4% 62.5% 48.6% 53.0% 46.3% 57.6% 45.3% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2019 45/46 2.3 3.2 59.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.7% 44.3% 57.1% 44.6% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2020 9/9 1.7 3.7 55.7% 61.4% 45.7% 47.7% 45.5% 54.5% 42.6% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2021 10/10 1.5 4.7 58.2% 56.5% 42.6% 45.9% 41.6% 50.3% 41.3% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2023 2/2 3.0 4.0 56.9% 75.4% 47.3% 72.2% 33.6% 63.3% 41.3% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2024 31/31 2.3 2.8 61.0% 62.9% 45.8% 56.6% 46.6% 56.3% 41.4% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2025 9/12 3.0 2.9 60.8% 64.0% 39.8% 50.5% 54.3% 54.8% 35.3% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
Career — 153/162 2.0 3.3 59.9% 62.8% 45.3% 51.0% 46.4% 55.7% 43.0% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yafan Wang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2014 1549 108.9 +0.74 -0.59 0.938 49.0% +23 — — 60.0% +0.30 2–0 1–0 — +0.08 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2015 1547 110.0 -0.18 +0.18 0.652 40.6% +23 — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.60 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2016 1534 105.6 -1.38 -0.88 0.910 47.4% +5 — — 32.0% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.89 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2017 1542 112.4 -2.61 -0.87 0.969 49.5% -4 — — 52.4% +0.19 0–1 2–0 — +0.58 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2018 1620 128.2 +0.80 +1.73 1.069 51.3% +35 -66 — 47.1% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.42 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2019 1723 137.5 +0.52 +1.84 1.042 50.7% +39 -253 -98 50.0% +0.15 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 100.9 -1.32 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2020 1667 112.2 -0.43 +0.38 0.936 48.6% +16 — — 36.4% -0.59 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 +0.03 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2021 1497 99.0 -3.37 -2.01 0.830 45.7% +87 -116 +97 24.0% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.73 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2023 1628 111.4 -0.86 +3.00 1.127 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.05 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2024 1719 129.9 +0.04 -1.32 0.948 48.9% +47 -335 -162 45.1% -0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 106.5 -0.37 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2025 1697 123.7 -1.23 -4.33 0.781 46.0% +5 — — 32.1% -1.21 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -0.89 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
Career — 1803 129.6 -0.28 +0.09 0.971 49.3% +29 -198 -65 43.3% -0.37 26–25 (51%) 20–19 (51%) 101.9 -0.31 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.