H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Yafan Wang vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-1

Yafan Wang and Madison Brengle are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2021 Phillip Island Trophy first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yafan Wang
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #85 6-3 6-4 Yafan Wang #98 Match data Feb 15, 2021* R64 Phillip Island Trophy WTA 250 Hard
Yafan Wang #140 6-2 6-2 Madison Brengle #72 Match data Oct 2, 2016 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yafan Wang #422 #47 1,185 1,802 72 90 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yafan Wang Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2014 3–1 75.0% #180 1,549 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2015 1–3 25.0% #136 1,546 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2016 3–8 27.3% #116 1,533 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2017 5–5 50.0% #170 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2018 11–12 47.8% #70 1,619 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2019 25–21 54.3% #48 1,723 0 1 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2020 3–6 33.3% #95 1,667 0 1 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2021 1–9 10.0% #309 1,496 0 1 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2023 1–1 50.0% #100 1,628 0 1 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2024 15–16 48.4% #61 1,718 0 1 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2025 4–8 33.3% #279 1,697 0 1 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yafan Wang Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2019 22 14 36 61.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2020 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 63 69 132 47.7% 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 153/162 of Yafan Wang's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yafan Wang Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2014 4/4 2.0 4.5 59.7% 64.6% 43.3% 56.5% 66.7% 56.0% 41.3% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2015 1/4 0.0 4.0 63.8% 50.0% 41.2% 28.6% 25.0% 46.8% 34.7% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2016 9/11 1.0 3.3 56.8% 62.9% 42.8% 35.4% 38.0% 54.1% 41.8% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2017 10/10 1.1 3.5 57.8% 58.4% 43.0% 57.8% 57.8% 51.5% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 23/23 2.0 3.0 64.4% 62.5% 48.6% 53.0% 46.3% 57.6% 45.3% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2019 45/46 2.3 3.2 59.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.7% 44.3% 57.1% 44.6% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2020 9/9 1.7 3.7 55.7% 61.4% 45.7% 47.7% 45.5% 54.5% 42.6% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2021 10/10 1.5 4.7 58.2% 56.5% 42.6% 45.9% 41.6% 50.3% 41.3% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2023 2/2 3.0 4.0 56.9% 75.4% 47.3% 72.2% 33.6% 63.3% 41.3% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2024 31/31 2.3 2.8 61.0% 62.9% 45.8% 56.6% 46.6% 56.3% 41.4% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2025 9/12 3.0 2.9 60.8% 64.0% 39.8% 50.5% 54.3% 54.8% 35.3% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 153/162 2.0 3.3 59.9% 62.8% 45.3% 51.0% 46.4% 55.7% 43.0% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yafan Wang Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2014 1549 108.9 +0.74 -0.59 0.938 49.0% +23 — — 60.0% +0.30 2–0 1–0 — +0.08 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2015 1547 110.0 -0.18 +0.18 0.652 40.6% +23 — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.60 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2016 1534 105.6 -1.38 -0.88 0.910 47.4% +5 — — 32.0% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.89 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2017 1542 112.4 -2.61 -0.87 0.969 49.5% -4 — — 52.4% +0.19 0–1 2–0 — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1620 128.2 +0.80 +1.73 1.069 51.3% +35 -66 — 47.1% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.42 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2019 1723 137.5 +0.52 +1.84 1.042 50.7% +39 -253 -98 50.0% +0.15 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 100.9 -1.32 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2020 1667 112.2 -0.43 +0.38 0.936 48.6% +16 — — 36.4% -0.59 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 +0.03 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2021 1497 99.0 -3.37 -2.01 0.830 45.7% +87 -116 +97 24.0% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.73 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2023 1628 111.4 -0.86 +3.00 1.127 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.05 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2024 1719 129.9 +0.04 -1.32 0.948 48.9% +47 -335 -162 45.1% -0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 106.5 -0.37 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2025 1697 123.7 -1.23 -4.33 0.781 46.0% +5 — — 32.1% -1.21 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -0.89 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 129.6 -0.28 +0.09 0.971 49.3% +29 -198 -65 43.3% -0.37 26–25 (51%) 20–19 (51%) 101.9 -0.31 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.