H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-0
Yafan Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2019 Shenzhen fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |