H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Yanina Wickmayer vs Na Li H2H: 2-0
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 2–0 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2011 Dubai third round 6-7(6) 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-7(6) 7-6(6) 6-2 | Na Li | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2010* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | Na Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yanina Wickmayer | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |
| 33 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |