H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yaroslava Shvedova vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 1-1
Yaroslava Shvedova and Evgeniya Rodina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay, while Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 Charleston second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-1 6-1 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2015* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-4 7-6(4) | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yaroslava Shvedova | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |