H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 2-1

Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 2–1 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2015 Hong Kong third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 2015* Hong Kong WTA 250 R32 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #85 6-4 6-4 Jarmila Wolfe #100 Match data
Mar 23, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jarmila Wolfe #29 6-4 3-1 (ret.) Yaroslava Shvedova #42 Match data
May 31, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Yaroslava Shvedova #36 6-4 6-3 Jarmila Wolfe #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,587 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —