H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-1

Yaroslava Shvedova and Kimiko Date are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2011 Indian Wells round of 128 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #56 6-4 7-5 Yaroslava Shvedova #42 Match data Mar 8, 2011* R128 Indian Wells WTA 1000 Hard
Yaroslava Shvedova #52 6-4 6-2 Kimiko Date #61 Match data Jan 20, 2010* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,753 142 178 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,469 0 1 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,666 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,646 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,616 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2016 16–17 48.5% #37 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,596 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,585 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,485 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11 10 21 52.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 109 179 39.1% 47 47 94 50.0% 25 22 47 53.2% — — — — — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — +0.24 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2007 1492 109.2 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +11 +77 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) +1.53 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -8 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +1.00 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2009 1601 137.0 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -57 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) +1.03 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2010 1667 129.4 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -71 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) +0.28 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +72 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -0.46 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2012 1690 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -20 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) -0.04 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -127 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) -0.47 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2014 1646 124.2 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -81 +44 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1617 122.6 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -33 +58 +132 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1694 135.4 +1.29 +0.02 1.010 50.4% +4 -86 +81 50.0% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1596 115.0 +0.79 -3.20 0.870 47.2% +22 -14 — 36.4% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1586 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1486 103.5 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -8 +72 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1754 131.5 +0.73 -0.46 0.990 49.7% -37 +48 +45 47.2% -0.13 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) +0.85 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.