H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-1

Yaroslava Shvedova and Lourdes Domínguez Lino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2013 Hobart International round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yaroslava Shvedova #28 6-4 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #46 Match data Jan 10, 2013* R32 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #148 6-4 3-6 6-2 Yaroslava Shvedova #31 Match data Sep 1, 2010* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,469 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,666 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,647 0 1 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,604 0 1 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1492 109.2 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +11 +77 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 96.9 +1.01 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -8 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.13 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2009 1601 137.0 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -57 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.16 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2010 1667 129.4 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -71 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.53 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +72 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2012 1690 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -128 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +42 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +131 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2016 1708 136.4 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +6 -100 +67 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 2021 1497 103.5 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -11 +77 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +42 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.90 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.