H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yaroslava Shvedova vs Vania King H2H: 1-1
Yaroslava Shvedova and Vania King are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vania King leads 1–0 on clay, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2013 Charleston second round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Vania King | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-4 6-2 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yaroslava Shvedova | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |