H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Vania King H2H: 1-1

Yaroslava Shvedova and Vania King are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vania King leads 1–0 on clay, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2013 Charleston Open round of 64 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #136 4-6 6-1 6-4 Yaroslava Shvedova #37 Match data Apr 3, 2013* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Yaroslava Shvedova #45 6-4 6-2 Vania King #52 Match data Aug 29, 2012* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova — #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,468 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,667 0 1 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1
24 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,648 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,605 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2% — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/318 of Yaroslava Shvedova's and 237/289 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2006 3/3 2.3 2.7 45.6% 64.2% 50.7% 16.7% 47.2% 57.7% 46.4% 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2007 17/24 2.6 3.4 57.6% 63.5% 44.3% 48.3% 51.3% 54.0% 39.2% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2008 14/19 3.1 2.9 62.5% 60.4% 48.9% 50.9% 42.9% 56.2% 42.2% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2009 33/35 3.5 3.2 60.1% 67.7% 49.4% 54.7% 45.7% 60.4% 44.5% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2010 41/45 3.2 4.4 60.1% 62.0% 43.5% 48.1% 41.2% 54.6% 44.1% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2011 18/19 2.8 3.7 60.4% 60.6% 49.6% 53.0% 52.7% 55.7% 42.9% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2012 26/30 3.2 4.6 60.9% 67.0% 49.4% 56.5% 49.7% 59.9% 47.3% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2013 20/25 1.8 5.8 63.5% 60.8% 42.5% 36.3% 50.2% 53.9% 43.7% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2014 30/31 3.7 4.7 67.1% 63.6% 42.8% 54.7% 52.0% 56.6% 43.7% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2015 22/27 3.9 4.1 70.8% 63.1% 53.3% 52.9% 46.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2016 29/34 3.4 4.0 60.8% 66.9% 44.5% 58.1% 49.7% 57.9% 42.5% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2017 14/14 2.3 2.6 63.8% 60.8% 53.3% 43.1% 46.9% 58.1% 37.1% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
32 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.5% 16.7% 46.9% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 9/11 2.4 4.4 61.6% 56.6% 34.9% 42.8% 59.3% 48.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/320 3.1 4.0 62.2% 63.5% 46.5% 50.7% 48.0% 56.9% 42.8% — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51
19 2007 1492 109.4 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +12 +78 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.09 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10
20 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -7 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.14 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35
21 2009 1601 136.8 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -58 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.19 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40
22 2010 1667 129.5 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -70 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.55 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +73 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2012 1691 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -127 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +43 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +132 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2016 1709 136.5 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +5 -101 +66 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21 2018 1560 108.6 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1498 103.6 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -12 +76 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +43 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.94 — 1768 128.4 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.