H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Yaroslava Shvedova vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Rome second round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Venus Williams #12 6-4 7-6(4) Yaroslava Shvedova #47 Match data
Jul 7, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Venus Williams #8 7-6(5) 6-2 Yaroslava Shvedova #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yaroslava Shvedova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,587 0 1 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47